How to regain control of strategy in an organization where everyone has their own autonomy?

Many public universities today are asking themselves a very similar question: how can they maintain freedom of decision-making where it is valuable, while simultaneously maintaining a common direction? Faculty autonomy works as long as someone can piece it together into a coherent whole.

Within the decentralized structure of a public university in Central Europe, we've managed to smoothly reorganize our strategy—without revolution or unnecessary risk. A clear direction, clear priorities, and metrics have emerged, providing comfort in decision-making and enabling consistent long-term organizational development.

Jak zapanować nad strategią w organizacji, w której każdy ma własną autonomię?

Project goal

The University sought to develop a new development strategy for 2026–2031 while operating in a highly decentralised academic environment. Strong faculty autonomy, dispersed decision-making, and limited performance-management infrastructure required an approach that balanced strategic clarity with dialogue, ownership, and practical execution.

Assumptions

  • Design a new university-wide strategy grounded in the Balanced Scorecard methodology.
  • Define clear strategic objectives across four BSC perspectives: Financial; Customers & Stakeholders; Internal Processes; Learning & Growth.
  • Establish a measurable execution framework using lead and lag KPIs.
  • Engage eight autonomous faculties while fully respecting academic independence.

Actions taken

  • Symmetria Partners applied a dialogue-driven Balanced Scorecard approach, tailored to the realities of a public university:
  • Conducted comprehensive staff surveys among academic and administrative employees.
  • Facilitated strategic workshops with university leadership and cross-functional working groups.
  • Developed a Balanced Scorecard strategy map based on explicit cause-and-effect logic.
  • Defined key strategic objectives supported by a coherent set of performance indicators.
  • Designed a pragmatic reporting model using Excel-based tools and manual data collection.
  • Cascaded the strategy to faculty and key functional levels to ensure ownership and accountability.

Effect

  • A coherent, transparent strategy formally approved by university leadership and ready for implementation.
  • Clearly articulated priorities supported by concrete success metrics across all strategic areas.
  • Seven priority objectives for 2026, aligned with the university’s three strategic pillars.
  • A defined execution rhythm: monthly implementation meetings, quarterly reviews, and annual evaluations.
  • A faculty engagement model that strengthens ownership while preserving academic autonomy.
  • A robust foundation for systematic strategy monitoring throughout the 2026–2031 horizon.

Duration

Strategy definition phase – 6 months

This case demonstrates how the Balanced Scorecard can be successfully adapted to complex, non-corporate environments, enabling strategic alignment, transparency, and execution—without heavy systems or top-down mandates.

If your organization faces the challenge of designing a strategy in a complex, decentralized structure—and needs clear direction, metrics, and a pragmatic implementation model—we help translate strategic goals into a practical system of action based on dialogue, accountability, and ease of implementation.